Version 2 (modified by 3 years ago) (diff) | ,
---|
Sensitivity of the Global Water Cycle on Mars to the physical timestep
Author: J. Naar
Date: 09/2021
What is up with the Global Water Cycle
The implementation of Radiatively Active Clouds (RACs) in the GCM, along with a full cloud microphysics scheme, allows for a satisfying agreement between simulated Global Water Cycle and TES observations regarding atmospheric water vapor and cloud opacity (figure 1). In this configuration, the Northern polar cap is set as an infinite ground ice reservoir avalaible for sublimation (figure 2). The global water cycle is sensitive to four main parameters listed in the table below.
callphys.def from Navarro et al. 2014
PARAMETERS | COMMENTS | INTERACTION |
---|---|---|
albedo_h2o_ice=0.35 | Frost & Northern water cap albedo | Ground ice |
inert_h2o_ice= 800 | Water ice thermal inertia | Ground ice |
mteta = 0.95 | Water contact parameter | Cloud microphysics |
nuice_sed=0.1 | Size distribution of nuclei | Cloud microphysics |
Reference papers
Navarro et al. (2014), https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013JE004550
Attachments (3)
-
navarro_comp_ts.png (149.1 KB) - added by 3 years ago.
Comparison between TES observations, GCM with Navarro et al. 2014 settings and increased temporal resolution
-
watercaptag_64x48.png (36.8 KB) - added by 3 years ago.
Grid cells with the watercaptag=.true. attribute in 64x48 standard resolution
-
best_simu.png (85.0 KB) - added by 3 years ago.
ref_wc_iphysiq5
Download all attachments as: .zip