| 3 | |
| 4 | '''20^th^ January 2022''' |
| 5 | {{{ |
| 6 | Duration: 1h10mn |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Participants: Jiandong, Lucas, Siteng, Romain, Christophe, Ehouarn, Margaux, Antoine, Thomas |
| 9 | Aymeric, Sandrine |
| 10 | |
| 11 | News: |
| 12 | - Be ready to contribute in the coming weeks to the "Atmosphere planétaires" project |
| 13 | application to obtain HPC computing hours for 01/05/2022-30/04/2023 (Occigen |
| 14 | will shut down and we'll move to Irene-Rome) |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log |
| 17 | ============== |
| 18 | - r2605-2617: OpenMP directives and code adaptation to run with OpenMP enabled |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1 |
| 21 | ============== |
| 22 | - None |
| 23 | - ticket about 32um emissivity; Christophe will add more information |
| 24 | - also the ticket about initracer to add some information in |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | Hot topics: |
| 28 | ========== |
| 29 | |
| 30 | * OpenMP:(Romain) |
| 31 | - OpenMP, tests on LMD computers OK; some issues still on Occigen |
| 32 | Will make a presentation on using/coding with OpenMP next week |
| 33 | |
| 34 | * Improving the water cycles (Antoine) |
| 35 | - water non-conservation issue: tests between beginning/end of physics show that |
| 36 | global planet-wide value changes within the dynamics. |
| 37 | to check: is the total mass of atmosphere conserved from 1 phys step to the next? |
| 38 | |
| 39 | * Non-orographic GW with the thermosphere setup (Jiandong) |
| 40 | - Has found more tuning parameters to play with which "solve" the polar warming and |
| 41 | can affect the phase of the thermal tides (by hanging where momentum is deposited) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Jiandong: |
| 44 | - looking also at the orographic GW code (to check connections with non-oro GW). |
| 45 | Cleaning/Upgrading the code to F90 and documenting it! |
| 46 | |
| 47 | Ehouarn: |
| 48 | - made new "clim", "cold", "warm" dust scenarios using the latest MY24-MY35 krieged dust maps |
| 49 | there are some not that minor differences with respect to the old (MCD5.*) ones; not that |
| 50 | straightforward to quantify as "old" dust scenarios are on 72x36 grids, whereas new ones are |
| 51 | on 120x60. It will probably make sense to have both "old" and "new" cold/clim/warm scenarios |
| 52 | in the GCM. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Margaux: |
| 55 | - submitted the HDO paper this morning |
| 56 | |
| 57 | Lucas: |
| 58 | - submitted his paper on Insight pressure |
| 59 | - working with Romain on the PEM. Tests at low obliquity with atmopheric collapse |
| 60 | (which is not as fast as expected); comparing with E. Dupont's internship results with nogcm |
| 61 | - tests with subslopes look good; implementing water ice in preparation |
| 62 | |
| 63 | Siteng: |
| 64 | - update on observations (TIRVIM) and comparisons with v5.3 GCM |
| 65 | - difference of phase between obs and model of ~1h (lag of the GCM wrt obs) |
| 66 | |
| 67 | Thomas: |
| 68 | - slope winds model in MCD6 : comparisons with the mesoscale model from which a GCM-like |
| 69 | mean field has been subtracted; has devised a more general minimizing scheme to |
| 70 | evaluate best fit parameters. Will use it on comparisons with data at mesoscale levels |
| 71 | from near-surface to ~2km. |
| 72 | }}} |