Changes between Version 58 and Version 59 of ArchiveReport


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 23, 2021, 2:55:14 PM (4 years ago)
Author:
cmathe
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ArchiveReport

    v58 v59  
    11= Archive of POULDP reports =
     2
     3
     4'''23^th^ September 2021'''
     5{{{
     6
     7Duration:1h
     8
     9Participants: Aymeric, Ehouarn, Christophe, Margaux, Siteng, Joseph, Thomas, Sandrine, Antoine, Jorge
     10              Jiandong
     11News:
     12====
     13- ESA PM on GCM/MCD Tuesday 28th afternoon.
     14
     15Recent commits:https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     16==============
     17- r2562: CO2 clouds microphysics improvements
     18- r2563: Improve writting the stats.nc file, can now be controlled by a stats.def file
     19         And no need to encapsulate calls to wstats with if (callstats) anymore
     20         (closes tickets #7 and #81)
     21- r2564: Look for a run.def file at runtime and stop if it is not there (closes ticket #71)
     22- r2565: Follow-up of r2562 (adaptations to newstart, start2archive & testphys1d)
     23
     24Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     25==============
     26- None
     27
     28Hot topics:
     29==========
     30
     31* Dynamico (Romain)
     32- TBC
     33
     34* Improving the dust cycle (Antoine)
     35- ran tests for multiple years to check water cycle stability (3rd year ongoing)
     36  getting wetter an wetter...
     37- other tests with changing rocketstorm fractions, does not seem to have much impact
     38- tested injecting at all local times,
     39
     40Joseph:
     41- made a wiki page about tuning the water cycle
     42  https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/wiki/WaterCycle
     43
     44Christophe:
     45- the right parameters for the CO2 number of bins for nucleation ? Changed from 100 to 5
     46  (like what is done for water), runs much faster, will check the impact on the results.
     47- analyses simulation over many years (10) and has a converged
     48  water cycle but converged state is way too dry (and overall decreasing with years?)
     49
     50Siteng:
     51- updates from EMM. Results from MY35, good LT coverage, as expected.
     52  The temperature anomalies look different from MY35 (Ls=60-80).
     53}}}
     54
     55
     56
     57'''16^th^ September 2021'''
     58{{{
     59Duration:1h
     60
     61Participants: Jiandong, Christophe, Francois, Romain, Antony, Antoine, Siteng, Margaux, Sandrine, Joseph, Jorge, Loic
     62
     63News:
     64====
     65- Science fair on 8-10 October with Mars stuff. Volunteers needed!
     66- Jorge has arrived from Bilbao for 4 months
     67- Planeto is dead
     68
     69Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     70==============
     71- r2561: (Joseph) changes for water caps
     72                 
     73Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     74==============
     75- None
     76
     77Hot topics:
     78==========
     79
     80* Improving the dust cycle (Antoine)
     81- ratio of column opacities (median OK but not mean)
     82  occurs for low latitudes/high altitudes for low dust columns
     83
     84  impact of the dust scenario ? might be wrong for high opacity
     85  comparisons with MY30 MY33
     86  Suggestion from François: extend the timeframe of injection                             
     87
     88* Dynamico (Romain)
     89- Running npb=40, 30 days (short dt, iphysiq=1), trying to continue with a longer timestep
     90
     91Siteng: Writing
     92        First MES T° profiles may be next week
     93
     94Margaux: presentation EPSC comparison ACS/gcm: more water vapor in the model
     95                                               + higher T° in the upper atm in particular (NH at LS 245°)
     96                      --> use new param. for icecaps, dissip ?,
     97
     98Loic: also doing comparisons but with Juan's data
     99
     100François: Diurnal mean wind for Insight, gcm is close to obs! but a strange point in Y2, a problem from instrument ?
     101          Is seismic noise also lower ?
     102
     103Sandrine submitted her paper!!!
     104}}}
    2105
    3106'''9^th^ September 2021'''