Changes between Version 55 and Version 56 of ArchiveReport


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 21, 2021, 10:37:49 AM (4 years ago)
Author:
cmathe
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ArchiveReport

    v55 v56  
    11= Archive of POULDP reports =
     2
     3'''17^th^ June 2021'''
     4{{{
     5Duration:1h30mn
     6
     7Participants: Antony, Ehouarn, Siteng, Christophe, Francois, Joseph, Adrien, Lucas, Margaux,
     8              Romain, Thomas, Loic
     9
     10News:
     11====
     12- TGO SWT#23 next week (Wednesday-Thursday), ask Francois if you want to attend.
     13
     14Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     15==============
     16- None
     17
     18Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     19==============
     20- #78: add some checking the validity of input fields coming from the dynamics
     21      at the beginning of the physics. => Ehouarn
     22
     23Hot topics:
     24===========
     25
     26* Time keeping in the start files
     27- Roland reports some problems when storing multiple time steps in restart/restartfi:
     28  I ran the GCM from sol 422 h 02 to sol 422 h 04, saving the start dump every hour.
     29  startfi.nc has day_ini = 422, hour_ini = 0, and Time = 0.083333 (=2h)
     30  start.nc is the same. OK I think.
     31  After running for two hours,
     32  restartfi.nc has day_ini = 422, hour_ini = 0.0833333, and Time = [0.04166667 0.08333333 0.125     ]
     33  restart.nc has day_ini = 422, hour_ini = 0, and Time = [0.04166667 0.08333333 0.125     ]
     34- we should probably just get rid of hour_ini altogether? => Romain
     35
     36* Dynamico
     37- Crazy behaviour if optim -O3 or -O2 ... (-O1 seems to work)
     38- strange unphysical patches of surface temperature in test run (seems to depend on physics call frequency)
     39  => check again in debug?
     40
     41Christophe:
     42- "solved" his problem (crash at month#9) re-running the code (updated version)
     43  => move on to iphysiq=5 (instead of iphysiq=10)
     44- convergence of results over 8 years of simulations with CO2 clouds, looking at the last 3 years
     45
     46Margaux:
     47- Simulations with the "old" (32 level + iphysiq=10) model with HDO, move on to "new" (54 levels+iphysiq=5)
     48  or not?
     49
     50Joseph:
     51- Water cycle tuning: influence of the contact parameter => temperature-dependent parameter
     52  Anni recommends the tanh() formulation rather than linear dependence
     53  But for now results are not better...
     54- Wonders about the possibility of having long term evolution of the aldebo of the long-term water cap
     55  (when frost becomes perennial cap)
     56
     57Antoine:
     58- IR-vis opacty conversion coefficient computed online => ranges from 0.1-8 ! (instead of 2.6)
     59  Better (colder) temperatures (compared to MCS) but still not cold enough...
     60- looks at the brightness of dust in the visible (test with higher +1% omegaVIS wrt reference)
     61  => perhaps to test with constant dust ?
     62}}}
     63
     64
     65'''10^th^ June 2021'''
     66{{{
     67
     68Duration: 1h25mn
     69
     70Participants: Francois, Christophe, Siteng, Thomas, Ehouarn, Margaux, Lucas, Romain, Antoine, Antony
     71              Joseph
     72
     73News:
     74====
     75- EnVision!
     76- MAMO dates: June 14-17 2022 (confirmed); ice-breaker on Monday 13 evening in Zamansky tower.
     77- Jiandong Liu will come to LMD on september 1st 2021 (1 year postdoc)
     78
     79Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     80==============
     81- 2530: re-commit of r2526 for testphys1d
     82- 2531: fix bug in vdifc that was introduced in r2515
     83- 2532-33: newstart2icosa update
     84
     85Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     86==============
     87- None
     88=> make a ticket about checking the validity of input fields coming from the dynamics
     89   at the beginning of the physics.
     90
     91Hot topics:
     92===========
     93
     94* Crash with unexpected unrealistic HDO ratio: (Jean-Yves, Margaux, Ehouarn)
     95HDO_ice ratio of 4000 from the dynamics
     96Problem identified (with isotopes) to comes from the dynamics.
     97To be continued...
     98
     99* 1=1 : (seq == parallel)
     100- Now OK, as of rev 2531
     101
     102Christophe:
     103- some crashes with negative geopotential when entering physics (after 6 years of simulation).
     104- nighttime CO2 clouds occur ~lon=-45 lat=0, but not when removing topography and diurnal cycles
     105
     106Romain:
     107- comparing Dynamico & LMDZ with water/dust/co2 cycles on. => strangely the initial
     108  conditions mismatch
     109- dissipation fac_up =30 needed for dynamico whilst =10 works for LMDZ
     110
     111Margaux:
     112- small study on the MY34 dust storm simulations, compared to MCS.
     113  vertical dust distribution => does not go high enough compared
     114  to observations (worsen by the microphysics), so tried injecting
     115  more dust in altitude to try to match MCS, but doesn't go the right
     116  way in 3D.
     117- option to try: use prescribed (Conrath) profile with microphysics
     118
     119Antoine:
     120- conversion coeff from IRAbs to VisibleExtinction is usually taken to 2.6 inthe GCM.
     121  investigates other values (3.4 ==> 1 um dust, or 1.8 ==> 2 um dust)
     122  Significant effect on the temperatures ~10K; depending on the season
     123  Is running computations where the coeff is computed online based on
     124  GCM column opacities vs dust scenarios columns
     125- will do a sensitivity study on the brightness of the dust (omega)
     126
     127Joseph:
     128- impact of temperature-dependent contact parameter: not much impact on the saturation
     129  => better water cycle, closer to observations, thins the polar hood.
     130- tested linear temperature dependence, but will check with hyperbolic formulation.
     131
     132Thomas:
     133- compared Insight opacity and dust scenarios (updated to lastest versions);
     134  the decrease after the stormsis steeper in the scenarios than observed.
     135  And overall observed opacities are much higher than in the scenario most of the time.
     136}}}
     137
     138
     139'''3^rd^ June 2021'''
     140{{{
     141Duration:1h20mn
     142
     143Participants: Ehouarn, Joseph, Christophe, Siteng, Antoine, Romain, Lucas, Thomas, Francois, Margaux
     144              Loic, Sandrine
     145News:
     146====
     147- selection of VERTIAS and Da-VINCI+ ; Venus rules!
     148
     149Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     150==============
     151- None
     152
     153Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     154==============
     155- None
     156
     157Hot topics:
     158===========
     159
     160* Crash with unexpected unrealistic HDO ratio: (Jean-Yves, Margaux, Ehouarn)
     161HDO_ice ratio of 4000 from the dynamics
     162Problem identified (with isotopes) to comes from the dynamics.
     163To be continued...
     164
     165* 1=1 : (seq == parallel)
     166- doesn't work with r2519 , but was OK with r2511 (Ehouarn)
     167
     168Romain:
     169- Dynamico: added tab-control in the XIOS outputs + adapted concatnc , zrecast & localtime
     170            => to be committed
     171
     172Siteng:
     173- TIRVIM retrievals  good between 5Pa and 200Pa
     174
     175Antoine:
     176- registered to IDRIS MPI & OpenMP trainings (september - october)
     177- dust scaling story: "dustradadjust" & tau_GCM reaches huge values locally
     178  dustradadjustis computed at 14LT and evolves linearly
     179  and at some locations tau_GCM changes by orders of magnitude over a day in the
     180  polar region where extreme values are obtained
     181  Also find the (lesser) problem in the tropics on the volcanoes
     182  => importance of topflows on volcanoes
     183  Tests with an upper limit of 5 for dustradadjust
     184
     185Margaux:
     186- will have an intern work on HDO observable simulator of ACS or plain GCM/observations
     187  comparison (as follow up to Loic's current work), or some "tagging" of water
     188
     189Joseph:
     190- writing paper on present day water cycle. Temperature dependent contact parameter
     191  improves things; will  look at how this changes saturation profiles.
     192
     193Thomas:
     194- slope winds in the MCD: comparisons with mesoscale work on the full wind
     195  or on the anomaly?
     196
     197Christophe:
     198- works on improvedco2cloud routine to separate meteoritic dust from the rest
     199
     200Ehouarn:
     201- 1=1 ?
     202- News from Chao Wang : has implemented the dust lifting (Mulholland) scheme
     203}}}
     204
     205
     206
     207'''27^th^ May 2021'''
     208{{{
     209Duration: 1h
     210
     211Participants: Joseph, Francois, Siteng, Thomas, Romain, Margaux, Antoine, Lucas, Aymeric, Christophe, Antony
     212
     213News:
     214====
     215MAMO workshop now tentatively planned on June 14-17. Francois is waiting for confirmation from Sorbone University for the Auditorium.
     216
     217Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     218==============
     219@2525  abierjon Mars GCM: Make a cleaner initialization of some variables in some logial variables in MCS simulator
     220
     221@2526  mvals     Mars GCM: testphys1d.F: Fix for the 1D, follow up from previous modifications of phys_state_var_init subroutine.
     222
     223@2527  jnaar     Bug correction in the 1d GCM, not compiling because of the of the "phys_state_var_init" routine
     224
     225@2528  cmathe     MARS: update zrecast utility
     226
     227Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     228==============
     229- None
     230
     231Ongoing discussions:
     232===================
     233
     234- Antoine: Fix erroneous dust opacities appearing in the southern polar night when using "dustradadjust". These opacities follow the baroclinic waves structure. Suggestion : work at the fortran code level from a appropriate start files, output with write(*,*) when and where there is the bug, end with "STOP" and try again and again...
     235
     236- Thomas : Slope winds. Struggle with the coriolis forces. Need to remove the sensitivity of friction to stability (Richardson). The fit is not yet perfect but not bad. Francois suggests to use anomaly (diurnal mean ave - instantaneous) even for the computed slope winds for comparison
     237
     238- Siteng : analysis of the role or a priori in the TIRVIM inversion and comparison with GCM
     239
     240- Antony and Romain : fixed the problems with tracers in Dynamico - Mars. Soon will do realistic Mars simulations ! Work on XIOS output
     241
     242- Antony : test on the effect of the dissipation on warming early Mars.
     243
     244- Margaux Vals : new results on D/H cycle and the model. 2 papers in preparation...
     245
     246- Christophe : Find a sensitivity of mesospheric CO2 ice clouds to dust scenario (MY28 vs clim scenario). See CO2 clouds in the afternoon at last!
     247}}}
     248
    2249
    3250