| | 2 | |
| | 3 | |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | '''22^th^ April 2021''' |
| | 6 | {{{ |
| | 7 | Duration: 1h35mn |
| | 8 | |
| | 9 | Participants: Francois, Lucas, Ehouarn, Antony, Antoine, Romain, Christophe, Margaux, Thomas, jean-Yves, |
| | 10 | Joseph |
| | 11 | Guest star: Sandrine |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log |
| | 14 | ============== |
| | 15 | - r2496-99 : Mesoscale work flow |
| | 16 | - r2500: Mesh boundaries definitions fix |
| | 17 | - r2501: change definition/value of ztime_fin written to restartfi.nc (when using dynamico) |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1 |
| | 20 | ============== |
| | 21 | - None |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | Wiki updates: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/wiki |
| | 24 | ============ |
| | 25 | - None |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | Ongoing discussions: |
| | 28 | =================== |
| | 29 | |
| | 30 | * Comparing GCM runs with TIRVIM (& MCS): (Antoine, Sandrine) |
| | 31 | Sandrine: obs TIRVIM vs "old" GCM (32 layers) and "new" GCM (54 layers) at 30 Pa, worse agreement in the latter. |
| | 32 | NB comparison is on observations grid (up to 1Pa); evolution of the diurnal cycle worse with "new" GCM |
| | 33 | => will use "old" (MCDv5.3 like) simulations for now. => rerun and output temp, wind, water, dust 24 times/day |
| | 34 | Antoine: Comparions with MCS; "new" run seems slightly warmer (looking at 3am+3pm diurnal ave). Overall a difference |
| | 35 | in the phases seems slightly better in the "new" run. |
| | 36 | |
| | 37 | * Brutal drying up in the thermosphere issue: (Francisco, Margaux) |
| | 38 | Francisco is focusing on the simulation where it happens |
| | 39 | Margaux is checking in various past revisions if the problem is still there. So far the problem always arises (even in 4 year old models). Has a test with 32 layers showing that the problem seems correlated to using the photochemistry... |
| | 40 | |
| | 41 | * Crash with unexpected unrealistic HDO ratio: (Jean-Yves, Margaux) |
| | 42 | HDO_ice ratio of 4000 from the dynamics |
| | 43 | Problem identified (with isotopes) to comes from the dynamics |
| | 44 | |
| | 45 | * 1+1=2: |
| | 46 | Correction to the time axis / housekeeping needed (Romain) |
| | 47 | |
| | 48 | * Dynamico-Mars: |
| | 49 | - what time to set when calling the physics from dynamico? |
| | 50 | |
| | 51 | * Calendar: |
| | 52 | - ptime sent to the physics in LMDZ == end of physics time step minus1 dynamical step... |
| | 53 | e.g. first time the physics is called ptime=dt_phys-dt_dyn (andnot 0 or dt_phys) |
| | 54 | why not sent the beginning or the end date of the physical time step date? |
| | 55 | |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | Joseph: |
| | 58 | - committed at noon today (r2502)the icelocation mode=4 case. |
| | 59 | - the new vdifc doesn't reproduce old results exactly. Check if this is linked to the sub-time stepping |
| | 60 | - investing the water cycle in current Mars changing mtot and albedo, always too dry during the second half of the year |
| | 61 | |
| | 62 | Lucas: |
| | 63 | - pb de calibration of pressure measurements on Insight; also checking 4 MSL data over 4 Mars years. |
| | 64 | |
| | 65 | Thomas: |
| | 66 | slope winds in the MCD. had some problems (projection issues) with the Coriolis parameter. Fixed now. |
| | 67 | Now uses the PBL heigh (with a min threshold of 300m) to compute reference parameter zfree0 for slope winds to |
| | 68 | account for diurnal evolution, but results not that good. Perhaps add a multiplicative factor to the buoyancy? |
| | 69 | }}} |