Changes between Version 51 and Version 52 of ArchiveReport


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 22, 2021, 2:30:35 PM (4 years ago)
Author:
cmathe
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ArchiveReport

    v51 v52  
    11= Archive of POULDP reports =
     2
     3
     4
     5'''22^th^ April 2021'''
     6{{{
     7Duration: 1h35mn
     8
     9Participants: Francois, Lucas, Ehouarn, Antony, Antoine, Romain, Christophe, Margaux, Thomas, jean-Yves,
     10              Joseph
     11Guest star: Sandrine
     12
     13Recent commits: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/log
     14==============
     15- r2496-99 : Mesoscale work flow
     16- r2500: Mesh boundaries definitions fix
     17- r2501: change definition/value of ztime_fin written to restartfi.nc (when using dynamico)
     18
     19Recent tickets: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/report/1
     20==============
     21- None
     22
     23Wiki updates: https://trac.lmd.jussieu.fr/Planeto/wiki
     24============
     25- None
     26
     27Ongoing discussions:
     28===================
     29
     30* Comparing GCM runs with TIRVIM (& MCS): (Antoine, Sandrine)
     31Sandrine: obs TIRVIM vs "old" GCM (32 layers) and "new" GCM (54 layers) at 30 Pa, worse agreement in the latter.
     32          NB comparison is on observations grid (up to 1Pa); evolution of the diurnal cycle worse with "new" GCM
     33          => will use "old" (MCDv5.3 like) simulations for now. => rerun and output temp, wind, water, dust 24 times/day
     34Antoine: Comparions with MCS; "new" run seems slightly warmer (looking at 3am+3pm diurnal ave). Overall a difference
     35         in the phases seems slightly better in the "new" run.
     36
     37* Brutal drying up in the thermosphere issue: (Francisco, Margaux)
     38Francisco is focusing on the simulation where it happens
     39Margaux is checking in various past revisions if the problem is still there. So far the problem always arises (even in 4 year old models). Has a test with 32 layers showing that the problem seems correlated to using the photochemistry...
     40
     41* Crash with unexpected unrealistic HDO ratio: (Jean-Yves, Margaux)
     42HDO_ice ratio of 4000 from the dynamics
     43Problem identified (with isotopes) to comes from the dynamics
     44
     45* 1+1=2:
     46Correction to the time axis / housekeeping needed (Romain)
     47
     48* Dynamico-Mars:
     49- what time to set when calling the physics from dynamico?
     50
     51* Calendar:
     52- ptime sent to the physics in LMDZ == end of physics time step minus1 dynamical step...
     53  e.g. first time the physics is called ptime=dt_phys-dt_dyn (andnot 0 or dt_phys)
     54  why not sent the beginning or the end date of the physical time step date?
     55
     56
     57Joseph:
     58- committed at noon today (r2502)the icelocation mode=4 case.
     59- the new vdifc doesn't reproduce old results exactly. Check if this is linked to the sub-time stepping
     60- investing the water cycle in current Mars changing mtot and albedo, always too dry during the second half of the year
     61
     62Lucas:
     63- pb de calibration of pressure measurements on  Insight; also checking 4 MSL data over 4 Mars years.
     64
     65Thomas:
     66slope winds in the MCD. had some problems (projection issues) with the Coriolis parameter. Fixed now.
     67Now uses the PBL heigh (with a min threshold of 300m) to compute reference parameter zfree0 for slope winds to
     68account for diurnal evolution, but results not that good. Perhaps add a multiplicative factor to the buoyancy?
     69}}}
    270
    371'''15^th^ April 2021'''